WSJ : Calpers Rethinks Its Risky Investments

Calpers Rethinks Its Risky Investments

The largest U.S. public pension plan is considering a dramatic retreat from some riskier investments, as it tries to simplify its $295 billion in holdings and better protect against losses during the next market downturn, according to people familiar with the matter.

California Public Employees' Retirement System is weighing whether to exit or substantially reduce bets on commodities, actively managed company stocks and hedge funds, the people said.

The pension, which manages investments and benefits for 1.6 million current and retired teachers, firefighters and other public employees, is a bellwether for investment trends at other public plans. Any shift it makes will likely influence others because of its size and history as an early adopter of alternatives to stocks and bonds.

"When Calpers makes a decision, it has a ripple effect through the state and local pension community," said Jean-Pierre Aubry of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

The discussions are taking place between the fund's interim Chief Investment Officer Ted Eliopoulos and Calpers's other top investment executives. The Calpers board hasn't yet been informed about any possible changes and no final decisions have been made, the people said.

The potential moves would constitute a major strategy change for a pioneer of public investments in so-called alternative assets. It isn't clear where Calpers would shift money pulled from these investments.

The retrenchments also could mean a reduction in external managers who are paid millions of dollars to make these bets for Calpers, these people said.

Many state and local pension funds were badly battered during the financial crisis and haven't yet recovered, leaving them struggling to meet obligations to 19 million workers and retirees nationwide. A run-up in the stock market has allowed Calpers to partially recover from the crisis, but it only had enough assets to cover 76% of guaranteed benefits to retirees as of June 30.

Calpers also is putting some new investment ideas on hold. Executives recently shelved internal discussions about whether to make a deeper push into securities backed by risky debt.

The Sacramento-based retirement system is wrestling with how much risk it should take as it follows one of its best performances since the financial crisis. The fund reported investment gains of 18.4% for the fiscal year ended June 30. That exceeded internal goals as domestic and international equities rose nearly 25%, real estate was up 14% and private equity increased 20%.

A top Calpers executive declined to discuss specific areas under review but acknowledged that a number of big questions are up for discussion, including whether the pension's most-complex investments are too small to make an impact on the fund's overall returns. Another issue is whether the fund can rely on individual trading bets to beat the overall market.

"What you have to ask yourself is, can you trade your way to success with $300 billion?" said Eric Baggesen, the fund's senior investment officer for asset allocation and risk management.

Until somewhat recently, pension funds invested almost exclusively in stocks and bonds. Calpers was among the first to invest heavily in real estate in the 1990s and then hedge funds and private equity in the early 2000s.

By October 2007, Calpers's assets hit a precrisis high of $260 billion. During the financial crisis of 2008-2009, they dropped to $165 billion as some of those alternative investments didn't perform as expected, particularly real estate and private equity.

Just one bad year can have serious consequences, since Calpers relies on its returns and contributions from local governments to fund pensions. Calpers has to request more money from municipalities if its investments decline in value, and cash-strapped cities then are forced to cut services or raise taxes to cover the bill.

Calpers hinted at a shift away from complex investments last fall when it released a set of investment principles that included a warning that the fund "will take risk only where we have a strong belief we will be rewarded for it." In February, it approved a new set of investment goals that reduced future exposure to equities and private equity while increasing allocations to bonds and real estate.

One of the more-dramatic moves under consideration is a complete pullback from tradable indexes tied to energy, food, metals and other commodities, according to people familiar with the discussions. Calpers began making such investments in 2007 as a way of diversifying its portfolio and it currently has $2.4 billion in such derivatives, or less than 1% of total holdings.

Executives on Calpers's investment staff also are debating whether it would be better to shift $55 billion it currently invests in individual company stocks and link those investments to broader market targets such as industries or countries, said people familiar with the discussions.

Another topic of discussion is what to do with Calpers's $4.5 billion hedge-fund portfolio, which amounted to 1.5% of the pension plan's total holdings as of June 30. Calpers in 2002 became one of the first public pensions to invest in such funds, which charge higher fees and typically bet on stocks, bonds or other securities using borrowed money. But over the past year, staff members have clashed over whether the investments are too complicated, can truly act as a buffer during a crisis or are large enough to affect Calpers's overall returns. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that Calpers already is reducing its hedge-fund stake and expects to take it as low as $3 billion as compared with $5 billion earlier in the year.

Former chief investment officer Joseph Dear was in favor of increasing Calpers's hedge-fund stake, but he died in February. In March, the board asked Mr. Eliopoulos to review the program, and he gave that task to fixed-income chief Curtis Ishii, said people familiar with the moves. Mr. Ishii's recommendations to the board are due in the fall.

>>> US After Hours Gainers

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings:  

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news:  AXAS +1.2% (raises Q3 production guidance to 6.9-7.0 Boepd, up from 6.5-6.7 Boepd), FOSL +0.3% ( Glenview Capital discloses 6.15% stake in 13G), SLXP +0.2% (FDA has granted tentative approval for UCERIS (budesonide) rectal foam for the induction of remission in patients with active mild-to-moderate distal ulcerative colitis)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings:  COOL -18%; ALOG -3.5%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news:  GST -7.2% (announced that it intends to offer 17 mln shares of its common stock ), LGP -3.7% ( announces public offering of 3.6 mln common unit), OPXA -2.4% (announces proposed public offering of common stock), AA -0.9% (announces proposed public offering of 25 mln depository share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock),

NY Post : Alibaba still fears ghost of botched Facebook-IPO

Alibaba Group could have sold nearly $2 billion worth of stock without lifting a finger. All it had to do was list its shares on Nasdaq.
That listing, expect Sept. 18, would have guaranteed Alibaba inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 Index by the end of the year, and funds which track the index would have had to buy.
But two sources familiar with the situation said Alibaba executives worried about Nasdaq’s ability to handle their $21 billion initial public offering later this month, since the exchange botched Facebook’s market debut two years ago.
Nasdaq tried to persuade Alibaba that it had fixed the problem, the sources said, but it is not clear whether they were swayed.
One of the sources said that Alibaba eventually was satisfied that Nasdaq had solved the issue and chose NYSE because its overall pitch was better. The other said Nasdaq executives believed that Alibaba decided that the possibility of a botched IPO, however small, outweighed the possible benefits of being in the index.
Alibaba and NYSE declined to comment, while a spokesman for Nasdaq, which has repeatedly said it has fixed the issues that went wrong in the Facebook IPO, said “It was a close race, and we wish Alibaba well.”
Alibaba’s misgivings about Nasdaq’s technology, two years after Facebook’s glitch-ridden, $16 billion market debut, show the incident continues to threaten Nasdaq’s reputation.
Listings contributed only 12 percent of Nasdaq’s $1.9 billion in revenues in 2013, and large listings such as Alibaba’s are less profitable for exchanges, but within the financial community they are taken as a barometer of success.
Nasdaq systems buckled under the tremendous volume of orders on the first day of trading in Facebook’s shares in 2012, leading to hours of delay.
In its presentation to Alibaba, Nasdaq detailed the steps it had taken to prevent another Facebook-style glitch, two sources familiar with the pitch said. The exchange has said it responded to Facebook by putting extra safeguards in place, creating new positions within the company to improve communications with the industry and regulators when errors occur, and establishing an engineering team to monitor and analyze daily performance.
The decision not to go with Nasdaq meant that Alibaba may not join any major global index this year.
“There is a pretty strong argument that index inclusion equals stability,” Kevin Landis, chief investment officer of Firsthand Capital Management, a Silicon-Valley-based technology-investing specialist with $400 million in assets under management.
ETFs and mutual funds that track such benchmarks have to buy and hold their stock.
The Nasdaq 100, which includes companies such as Apple and Google, has a market capitalization of $4.75 trillion. Funds such as the $46.8 billion QQQ PowerShares exchange-traded fund, the fifth-biggest ETF in the world, track the Nasdaq 100, according to data from Thomson Reuters’ Lipper service.
If the IPO values the company at $200 billion, Alibaba would have been about 3.3 percent of the index. There are more than $54 billion in ETF assets alone linked to the index, which means at least $1.7 billion would have flown into Alibaba shares.
The chance to get on Nasdaq 100 was a selling point for Facebook itself. In the lead-up to the Facebook IPO, Nasdaq reduced the amount of time a qualifying firm needs to be listed on Nasdaq in order to be added in the index to three months from a year.
Alibaba doesn’t qualify to be on many of the world’s major indices, since it is registered in the Cayman Islands. The behemoth S&P 500 Index, which has a market capitalization of $18.6 trillion, only lists US companies.
The Chinese firm is not eligible to be part of the biggest MSCI or FTSE indices for other reasons, although MSCI is looking at changing its index rules in a way that could put Alibaba on a major index.
And finally, Alibaba gave up a chance for mainland Chinese to invest, since China-based money manager Guotai Asset Management’s Guotai Nasdaq 100 Index trades on the Shanghai Stock Exchange.
“It falls into this no man’s land of indexing,” said Dennis Hudachek, a senior ETF specialist with ETF.com, an expert on exchange-traded funds.

NY POSt : Price war brewing for video streamers

Don’t care to pay for cable? Get ready for a slew of Internet-based TV alternatives promising cheaper service.
A number of media and telecom players are rolling out Netflix-like offerings aimed at a relatively small slice of the market that doesn’t subscribe to traditional pay TV.
AT&T, DirecTV, Dish Network, Sony and Verizon are all readying “over-the-top” online video services that bypass the cable or satellite-TV bundle.
These services are shaping up to be slimmer, more tailored offerings that will cost closer to $30 a month, compared with bigger pay-TV packages more than double that at around $75.
Most of the companies jumping on the broadband wagon claim their goal isn’t to encourage “cord cutting” — when people cut cable to save money — but rather to reach the 8 to 10 million US households that can’t or won’t pay for TV service.
Still, some analysts predict a “spin-down,” with a wave of existing pay-TV customers trading in their more expensive pay TV packages for a cheaper broadband-delivered TV bundle.
Just last week Sony signed a deal to carry Viacom’s cable channels as part of its Web-based programming service, while DirecTV’s Ya Veo service will chase the Hispanic audience with content from Spanish-language broadcaster Univision.
All these players will be competing against the first movers in the streaming space, including Netflix, Amazon, Hulu Plus, as well as more niche players like WWE and MLB.
“There are two things that make [broadband delivered TV] financially attractive,” said MacQuarie analyst Amy Yong.
“There’s not a lot of capital expenditure — you don’t need a box, there’s no equipment and it also allows for a huge targeted advertising opportunity.”

(BFW) AB InBev Offer for SABMiller Likely Won’t Happen This Yr: ISI


AB InBev Offer for SABMiller Likely Won’t Happen This Yr: ISI
2014-09-15 19:13:52.129 GMT


By Joshua Fineman
Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) -- If AB InBev were actively
considering a deal for SABMiller, U.K. takeover panel would
require disclose by ABI BB and/or SAB, ISI analyst Robert
Ottenstein told clients in earlier note, citing conversation
with member of takeover panel.
* Potential deal not “off the table,” may happen in next 3-6
mos; ISI previously said 50% chance a deal occurs by end of
2015
* ABI BB rated buy; still expects large purchase by end of
2015, most likely SAB LN; Molson Coors trated buy, though
may drop in N-T; sees $2.20 of accretion to ISI’s 2015 est.
if TAP bought rest of MillerCoors; TAP may be worth ~$95 in
mid 2015 (26% upside)
* Maintains buy on SAB LN, though may be hurt if no strategic
transaction
* NOTE: Earlier, AB InBev Not in Talks to Finance SABMiller
Purchase: CNBC; AB InBev Talking to Banks About Financing
SABMiller Deal: DJ
* Earlier, SABMiller Spurned by Heineken Family After
Making Approach
* NOTE: Increased Chance Anheuser-Busch Bids for SABMiller:
Stifel
* BUD up as much as 3.6%, most intraday since July 31; TAP up
as much as 8.3%, most since May 2009; SAB LN closed up 9.8%,
most since Oct. 2011


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Joshua Fineman in New York at +1-212-617-8953 or
jfineman@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Arie Shapira at +1-212-617-1488 or
ashapira3@bloomberg.net

>>> US Close Dow +0,26% S&P-0,07% Nasdaq-1,07% Russel -1,21%

Closing Market Summary: Stocks Begin Week on Mixed Note

The stock market welcomed the new trading week with a mixed session that saw relative strength among large-cap stocks, while high-beta names underperformed. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.3%) and S&P 500 (-0.1%) finished near their flat lines, while the Nasdaq Composite and Russell 2000 both lost 1.1%.

Equities began the day on a cautious note amid continued concerns regarding the strength of the global economy. Over the weekend, China reported its first decline in electricity production since 2009, while Industrial Production (6.9%; expected 8.8%) grew at its slowest pace since December 2008. Likewise, the Industrial Production report from the U.S. (-0.1%; Briefing.com consensus 0.3%) also left a bit to be desired.

In that same vein, participants have had to contend with cautious comments from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which lowered its 2014 GDP forecast for the U.S. (to 2.1% from 2.6%) and the Eurozone (to 0.8% from 1.2%).

Once the session got going, high-growth stocks weighed on the market and led to the underperformance of the Nasdaq Composite. Biotech names played a part with the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 266.09, -3.48) sliding 1.3%. For its part, the top-weighted countercyclical sector—health care (-0.3%)—finished among the laggards.

Elsewhere, the top-weighted cyclical sector—technology (-0.6%)—suffered from noteworthy losses among social media and chipmaker names. Twitter (TWTR 49.38, -2.73), Facebook (FB 74.58, -2.90), Weibo (WB 21.05, -2.76), LinkedIn (LNKD 207.71, -17.12), and Yelp (YELP 76.62, -5.16) tumbled between 3.7% and 11.6%. Chipmakers did not fare much better with the PHLX Semiconductor Index falling 1.2%. The sector-wide weakness masked the outperformance of Apple (AAPL 101.60, -0.06), which settled little changed after confirming record orders for the upcoming iPhone.

Also of note, the energy sector (+0.7%) rebounded after ending last week well behind other sectors. The growth-sensitive sector narrowed its September loss to 4.5% with help from Dow components Chevron (CVX 124.24, +1.58) and ExxonMobil (XOM 96.29, +0.51). The two added 1.3% and 0.5%, respectively, while crude oil rose 0.7% to $92.89/bbl.

Treasuries notched their highs shortly before the start of the session and spent the remainder of the day near those levels. The 10-yr note added six ticks with its yield slipping two basis points to 2.59%.

Participation remained on the light side with fewer than 600 million shares changing hands at the NYSE.

Economic data was limited to the Empire Manufacturing Survey and Industrial Production:
  • The Empire Manufacturing Survey for September registered a reading of 27.5, which was above the prior month's reading of 14.7 
    • The consensus expected a reading of 16.0 
  • The industrial production report for August certainly didn't go according to script as it showed production declining 0.1% versus the consensus estimate, which called for a 0.3% increase 
    • A 7.6% decline in the production of motor vehicle and parts was the big drag on total industrial production for the month. That contributed to a 4.4% drop in the output of durable consumer goods and led to a 0.4% decline in manufacturing production 
    • The production data for July was revised down to show a 0.2% increase versus an originally reported 0.4% increase 
    • Capacity utilization slumped to 78.8%, which was also below the consensus estimate of 79.3% and below a downwardly revised 79.1% (from 79.2%) reading for July 
Tomorrow, The Producer Price Index (consensus 0.0%) will be released at 8:30 ET, while Net Long-Term TIC Flows will be reported at 16:00 ET.
  • Nasdaq Composite +8.2% YTD 
  • S&P 500 +7.4% YTD 
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +2.7% YTD 
  • Russell 2000 -1.4% YTD

>>> Novo Nordisk A/S confirms Saxenda (liraglutide) for the treatment of obesity

Novo Nordisk A/S confirms Saxenda (liraglutide) for the treatment of obesity received positive 14-1 vote in favor of approval from FDA Advisory Committee 

Co announced that the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) of the FDA has completed its meeting regarding the New Drug Application for Saxenda, the intended brand name for liraglutide 3 mg, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue for the treatment of obesity.

>>> ACHN -9,2% - Decent options activity

ACHN Oct 14 calls are seeing interest with the underlying stock trading lower by 10% (volume: 3710, open int: 5390, implied vol: ~135%, prev day implied vol: 126%) -- we noted bullish activity in the Oct 15 calls on Sep 8 . ACHN call buying accompanied renewed M&A rumor last month (subsequently reported earnings)